Don’t Apply To Safety Schools For Their Own Sake
Some advice as application season concludes for many seniors in high school
As college application deadlines loom and students make their final decisions about where to apply, the conventional wisdom is clear: Because it’s never been harder to get into your dream school, apply to multiple safety schools.
The conventional wisdom is mistaken, however. There’s a significant downside to enrolling in a school that a student isn’t excited about attending, so students shouldn’t apply to a bunch of safety schools just because they think that’s what they are supposed to do.
Start with the statistics.
If the goal is to get into college, the odds are great.
Fewer than 100 colleges are highly selective, which means they accept less than 25 percent of applicants. Nearly 500 four-year colleges accept more than 75 percent of applicants. There are also open-admissions colleges that accept nearly everyone who graduates high school.
Despite the meteoric rise in applications to selective colleges and universities, collectively speaking, it’s statistically easier to get into one of the top 50 schools today than it was a generation ago. A big reason that any single top college has become so selective is that so many applicants have taken advantage of the Common Application and adopted the mantra that applying to more colleges is better.
Given that students will get into schools if they just apply to enough of them, it suggests that students shouldn’t be left without any options having applied only to their dream schools.
But students shouldn’t just add safety schools that they wouldn’t be excited to attend.
Here’s why.
My fellow researchers and I collected and analyzed more than 200 personal stories and conducted surveys of more than 1,000 students who have chosen different paths for higher education. The research, which we wrote about in Choosing College, revealed that there are five primary reasons that students choose the school they attend. They enroll to get into their best school, do what’s expected of them, get away, step it up, or extend themselves.
For the students who are seeking to get into their best school, if that sounds recursive, it's because it is. These students are looking to take the next logical step in their lives by having the classic “college experience.” They are focused on getting into school, less on what they will do after they get in.
This emphasis on getting into the “best school” does have a strong track record of success—83 percent of the students reported being satisfied.
It also leaves students prone to a pitfall, however: attending a school that isn’t right for them.
That happens all too often when students don’t get into their dream schools, are unexcited by their remaining options, and still feel the need to enroll.
Rather than seeking to get into their best school, they attend to do what others—like their parents, friends, guidance counselor, teachers and mentors—expect of them.
Students who go to school to do what’s expected of them have a very different experience from the first cluster of students.
Fifty-four percent were dissatisfied with their schooling experience. A whopping 74 percent transferred or dropped out.
One student we talked to, Kolby (the terms of our research protocol required that we use pseudonyms), had his heart set on going to a highly selective school tucked away in a remote part of the country. Its study abroad and language-learning programs were unparalleled.
In case he didn’t get in, Kolby applied to seven other schools.
His dream school, along with his second choice and two other colleges, rejected him.
Of the four safety schools where he was accepted, none excited him.
His mom forced him to enroll in his state’s flagship university, a top-ranked school, rather than take a year off or join the military.
But it was the wrong fit. It was in a city. The university didn’t have the language and study-abroad programs he wanted. And Kolby despised the experience.
The takeaway?
Students should not apply to schools they wouldn’t be excited to attend or just because someone else thinks it’s a “great school.”
But what if they don’t get into any of the schools that excite them?
Students should broaden their options for what’s next. They don’t have to enroll in college right away, for example.
There are other pathways, such as taking a gap year during which they can learn more about themselves and then reapply to colleges. Data show that students who take a gap year do better when they ultimately enroll in college than those who go straight to college.
That’s a much better outcome than falling into the safety school trap.
Yes - and No. Kolby was (perhaps still is) a moron. I think most of us were at that age. (I know I was.)
School is all about getting a good job, where the definition of 'good' is getting paid for doing something you would do anyway (even for free if you had the choice, which of course most of us that work do not).
So what about Kolby? Kolby's a moron because he didn't pass the top test that all intelligent HR persons ('oxy'moron?) look for above and beyond all. We all run into circumstances (all the time!) that aren't exactly tailored to our beliefs and/or interests and/or abilities. What sets the non-morons apart from the morons is that they leverage the discomfort to find an aspect that they can tolerate, maybe learn something from, perhaps contribute, and maybe even thrive. Life Lesson #1 (or thereabouts) is that: There's cool stuff everywhere, including in the depths of hell - and those that have the temerity to locate and leverage it quickly rise head and shoulders above the rest when things get better.
Kolby missed a clear and present opportunity to demonstrate what he's made of, including the potential of a component that would make him a valuable asset in organizations known for attracting, keeping, and effectively applying such jewels (and paying them well for doing something they genuinely like to do, like find more opportunities).
THAT is what this discussion should be about - rather than the first-world (read "obtusely insignificant") problem of not everyone being able to attend Harvard.